So, recently it was RSA, and now Barracuda. Who next ?
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2011/04/11/barracuda_networks_attack/
I think that I agree with one of the postings on the register. If Barracuda, (a vendor who makes/promotes WAF's) admit even their own site wasn't protected by their own technologies - because their WAF was in monitor-mode - then that is unforgiveable. How can you promote and sell this stuff if you are then compromised ? How many more vendors will be watching this from afar and thinking - will we be next ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment